A good laryngeal view does not guarantee perfectly successful tracheal intubation
نویسنده
چکیده
tracheal intubation is the most common factor related to serious airway complications during anesthesia [1]. Difficult tracheal intubation is defined as insertion of the endo-tracheal tube using direct laryngoscopy that requires more than two attempts lasting more than 10 min each or that requires an alternative technique [2]. The difficult airway involves interactions among patient factors, the clinical setting, and the prac-titioner's skills [3]. Many alternative tools and techniques have been developed to facilitate intubation in cases of difficult direct laryngoscopy. Among these, videolaryngoscopy (VL) improves glottis visualization using either an optical or video system, which allows communication between the operator and assistants and facilitates teaching; this method is gaining popularity [4]. Recently, VL has begun to be considered as a first-line tool for airway management, rather than as a rescue tool for difficult intubation [3,5,6]. However, VL does not achieve a 100% intuba-tion success rate, and complications have been associated with the procedure [5,7,8]. With VL, the success of intubation lies not in the view obtained, but in the ease of inserting the endotrache-al tube. Instead of the Cormack-Lehane scoring system, Swann et al. [9] proposed the Fremantle score, calculated using a three-part scoring system based on the laryngeal view (full, partial, or no view), ease of endotracheal intubation (easy, modified, or unachievable), and device used. The Korean Society of Anes-thesiologists should consider the use of this new scoring system and various tools for cases of difficult intubation. In this issue of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, Shim et al. [10] compared GlideScope Ⓡ and McGrath Ⓡ laryngoscopes in simulated cases of difficult intubation. They used a four-grade videoscopic view. However, they did not precisely describe the grade. In addition, a tube exchanger and vascular forceps were used instead of a rigid stylet, which can be associated with complications [8]. Although a difficult airway was simulated with an extrication collar, actual patients with difficult airways were excluded. In the simulation, the first-attempt success rates were 82.8% (GlideScope Ⓡ group) and 83.8% (McGrath Ⓡ group). Failed intubation with the GlideScope Ⓡ was also reported in this issue of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology [11]. There was resistance to passage of the endotracheal tube into the larynx with a conventional laryngoscope. The GlideScope Ⓡ then revealed that a septum divided the subglottic area into two sections. A laryngeal mask did not provide adequate ventilation due to laryngeal edema caused by multiple …
منابع مشابه
A randomized trial comparing the Ambu ® Aura-i ™ with the air-Q ™ intubating laryngeal airway as conduits for tracheal intubation in children.
OBJECTIVES To assess the clinical performance of the Ambu Aura-i (Aura-i) in children. AIM To compare the Aura-i with the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (air-Q) for the purposes of fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubation. BACKGROUND The Aura-i is a new supraglottic airway designed for tracheal intubation. MATERIALS/METHODS One hundred twenty children, ages 1 month to 6 years, were random...
متن کاملComparative performance of direct and video laryngoscopes in patients with predicted difficult airway.
To the Editor: In a prospective, randomized, clinical study including a broad range of patients with predictors of difficult intubation, Aziz et al. demonstrated that compared with the direct laryngoscope, the C-MAC video laryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) achieved a higher intubation success rate on first attempt, but required a longer intubation time. Other than the limitations de...
متن کاملA comparative Study of Tracheal Intubation through i-gel® and Intubating
In this prospective randomized study, success rate of blind tracheal intubation through two different supraglottic airway devices viz. i-gel ® and the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA)® was compared a using conventional polyvinylchloride endotracheal tubes. Eighty patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were randomized in two groups comprising of 40 patients each to...
متن کاملA pillow of 8 cm height did not improve laryngeal view and alignment of airway axes but increased anesthesiologist discomfort compared to a pillow of 4 cm height during tracheal intubation in adult patients
BACKGROUND Neck flexion by head elevation using an 8 to 10 cm thick pillow and head extension has been suggested to align the laryngeal, pharyngeal and oral axis and facilitate tracheal intubation. Presently, the laryngeal view and discomfort for tracheal intubation were evaluated according to two different degrees of head elevation in adult patients. METHODS This prospective randomized, cont...
متن کاملA Prospective Randomized Comparative Study on i-gel versus Laryngeal Mask Airway Fastrach as a Conduit for Blind Tracheal Intubation Using Conventional PVC Endotracheal Tubes in Reverse Orientation
Introduction: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Fastrach was specially designed as a conduit for blind tracheal intubation in anticipated difficult airway and where we do not require neck extension. i-gel is a disposable, cheap supraglottic device with wide bore stem which facilitates direct passage of a conventional polyvinylchloride (PVC) endotracheal tube. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 adul...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 69 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016